Auswahlbibliographie

  • Anterriotis, N. (2008). The direct speeches in the Posthomerica of Quintus of Smyrna. Diss. Athens.
  • Anzinger, S. (2007). Schweigen im römischen Epos. Stuttgart.
  • Auhagen, U. (1999). Der Monolog bei Ovid. Tübingen.
  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford.
  • Avery, M. M. (1937). The use of direct speech in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Diss. Chicago, IL.
  • Bär, S. (2021). The second divine council at Odyssey 5.1–42 reconsidered, in: Akroterion 66 (2021): 1–16.
  • Bär, S./Greensmith, E./Ozbek, L. (eds., 2022): Quintus of Smyrna’s Posthomerica. Writing Homer under Rome. Edinburgh.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres (translated by V. W. McGee), in: C. Emerson/M. Holquist (eds.). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: 60–102.
  • Barthes, R. (1966). Introduction à l’analyse structural du récit, Communications 8: 1–27.
  • Beck, D. (2005). Homeric conversation. Cambridge, MA.
  • Beck, D. (2012). Speech presentation in Homeric epic. Austin, TX. Digital appendix: https://homeric-speech-beck.la.utexas.edu.
  • Blackwell, C. and Smith, N. (2014). The Canonical Text Services URN specification, version 2.0.rc.1. http://cite-architecture.github.io/ctsurn_spec/.
  • Bodard, G./Cayless, H./Depauw, M./Isaksen, L./Lawrence, K. F./Rahtz, S. (2017). Standards for networking ancient person data. Digital approaches to problems in prosopographical space, Digital Classics Online 3: 28–43.
  • Christensen, J. P. (2015). Reconsidering ‘good’ speakers: speech-act theory, Agamemnon and the Diapeira of Iliad II, Gaia 18: 67–82.
  • Clark, M. (2002). Fighting words. How heroes argue, Arethusa 35: 99–115.
  • Coffee, N./Koenig, J.-P/Poornima, S./Forstall, C.W./Ossewaarde, R./Jacobson, S. (2013). Intertextuality in the digital age, TAPA 142: 383–422.
  • Coffee, N./Koenig, J.-P./Poornima, S./Forstall, C.W./Ossewaarde, R./Jacobson, S. (2013). The Tesserae Project: intertextual analysis of Latin poetry, LLC 28: 221–8.
  • Coffee, N./Forstall, C. W./Gawley, J. (2017). The Tesserae Project: detecting intertextuality of meaning and sound, in: P. Mastandrea (ed.). Strumenti digitali e collaborativi per le Scienze dell’Antichità. Antichistica 14, Filolologia e letteratura 3. Venice: 189–92.
  • Coffee, N./Forstall, C.W./Galli Milić, L./Nelis, D. (eds., 2020). Intertextuality in Flavian epic poetry: contemporary approaches. Berlin/Boston.
  • De Bakker, M./de Jong, I. J. F. (eds., 2022). Speech in ancient Greek literature (SAGN 5). Leiden.
  • De Jong, I. J. F. (1987a). Narrators and focalizers: the presentation of the story in the Iliad. Amsterdam.
  • De Jong, I. J. F. (1987b). The voice of anonymity: tis-speeches in the Iliad, Eranos 85: 69–84.
  • De Jong, I. J. F./Nünlist, R./Bowie, A. (eds., 2004). Narrators, narratees, and narratives in ancient Greek literature (Studies in ancient Greek narrative I). Leiden/Boston.
  • Dinter, M./Khoo, A. (2019). Messenger scenes in Greek epic, in: Reitz/Finkmann 2019, vol II.2, 481–500.
  • Dominik, W. (1994). Speech and rhetoric in Statius’ Thebaid. Hildesheim.
  • Dominik, W. (2002). Speech in Flavian epic, in: P. Defosse (ed.). Hommages à Carl Deroux, vol. I, Brussels: 183–92.
  • Eigler, U. (1988). Monologische Redeformen bei Valerius Flaccus. Frankfurt am Main.
  • Elderkin, G. W. (1906). Aspects of the speech in the Later Greek epic. Baltimore, MD.
  • Fingerle, A. (1939). Die Typik der homerischen Reden. Diss. Munich.
  • Finkmann, S. (2014). Collective speech and silence in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius and Valerius Flaccus, in: A. Augoustakis (ed.), Flavian poetry and its Greek past, Leiden 2014, 73–93.
  • Finkmann, S. (2019). Messenger scenes in Roman epic, in: Reitz/Finkmann 2019, vol. II.2: 501–61.
  • Finkmann, S. (2019). Necromancies in ancient epic, in: Reitz/Finkmann 2019, vol. II.2: 747–96.
  • Finkmann, S./Reitz, C./Walter, A. (2019). Prophecies in Roman epic, in: Reitz/Finkmann 2019, vol. II.2: 615–83.
  • Forstall, C.W./Coffee, N./Buck, T./Roache, K./Jacobson, S. (2015). Modeling the scholars: detecting intertextuality through enhanced word-level n-gram matching, DSH 30: 503–15.
  • Forstall, C.W./Scheirer, W.J. (2019). Quantitative intertextuality: Analyzing the markers of information reuse. Cham.
  • Frings, I. (1991). Gespräch und Handlung in der Thebais des Statius. Stuttgart.
  • Fuhrer, T./Nelis, D. (eds., 2010). Acting with words. Communication, rhetorical performance and performative acts in Latin literature. Vergil’s Aeneas and Venus acting with words: miscarried dialogues. Heidelberg.
  • Geisz, C. (2018). A study of the narrator in Nonnus of Panopolis’ Dionysiaca. Storytelling in late antique epic. Leiden.
  • Genette, G. (1972). Narrative discourse. An essay in method. Translated by J. E. Lewin. Ithaca.
  • Grethlein, J./Rengakos, A. (2009). Narratology and interpretation. Berlin/New York: 1–14.
  • Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation, in: P. Cole/J. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and semantics. New York: 41–58.
  • Grice, P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature, in: P. Cole (ed.). Radical pragmatics. New York: 183–98.
  • Griffin, J. (1986). Homeric words and speakers, JHS 106: 36–57.
  • Groß, A. (2003). Prophezeiungen und Prodigien in den Argonautica des Valerius Flaccus. Munich.
  • Harrison, S. J. (2007). Generic enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford/New York.
  • Hawes, G., and Smith, S. 2021. A Dataset of Mythical People with Stable URIs. MYTHLAB. https://www.manto-myth.org/blog/a-dataset-of-mythical-nameswith-stable-uris.
  • Heinze, R. (1903). Vergils epische Technik. Leipzig.
  • Helzle, M. (1995). Die Redeweise der Hauptpersonen in Silius Italicus’ Punica, C&M 46: 189–213.
  • Helzle, M. (1996). Der Stil ist der Mensch: Redner und Reden im römischen Epos. Stuttgart/Leipzig.
  • Highet, G. (1972). The speeches in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.
  • Ibscher, R. (1939). Gestalt der Szene und Form der Rede in den Argonautika des Apollonios Rhodios. Diss. Munich.
  • Johnson, K. P., Burns, P., Stewart, J., and Cook T. (2014–2021). CLTK: The Classical Language Toolkit. https://github.com/cltk/cltk.
  • Knudsen, R. A. (2014). Homeric speech and the origins of rhetoric. Baltimore, MD.
  • Kristeva, J. (1980): Word, dialogue, and novel, in: Desire in Language. A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: 64–91.
  • Kroll, W. (1924). Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur. Stuttgart.
  • Kroon, C. (1995). Discourse particles in Latin. A study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam.
  • Kyriakou, P. (2001). Warrior vaunts in the Iliad, RhM 144, 250–77.
  • Laird, A. (1999). Powers of expression, expressions of power: speech presentation and Latin literature. Oxford.
  • Latacz, J. (1974). Zur Forschungsarbeit an den direkten Reden bei Homer, GB 2: 395–422.
  • Lipscomb, H. C. (1909). Aspects of the speech in the later Roman epic. Diss. Baltimore, MD.
  • Lloyd, M. (2004). The politeness of Achilles: off-record conversation strategies, JHS 124: 75–89.
  • Lohmann, D. (1970). Die Komposition der Reden in der Ilias. Berlin/Boston.
  • Lundström, S. (1971). ‘Sprach’s’ bei Silius Italicus. Lund.
  • Mackie, C. J. (1984). Speech and narrative. Characterisation techniques in the Aeneid. Diss. Glasgow.
  • Mackie, H. (1996). Talking Trojan. Speech and community in the Iliad. Lanham, MD.
  • Martin, R. P. (1989). The language of heroes. Speech and performance in the Iliad. London.
  • Minchin, E. (2007). Homeric voices. Discourse, memory, gender. Oxford.
  • Minchin, E. (2011). The words of gods: divine discourse in Homer’s Iliad, in: A. P. M. H. Lardinois/J. H. Block/M. G. M. van der Poel (eds.). Sacred words. Orality, literacy and religion, vol. VIII, Leiden/Boston: 17–35.
  • Myres, J. L. (1954). The structure of the Iliad. Illustrated by the speeches, JHS 74: 122–41.
  • Offermann, H. W. (1968). Monologe im antiken Epos. Diss. Munich.
  • Quiroga, A. (ed. 2013). The purpose of rhetoric in Late Antiquity. Tübingen.
  • Rebischke, R. (1913). De Silii Italici orationibus. Diss. Königsberg/Danzig.
  • Reitz, C. (2019). Epic and rhetoric, in: Reitz/Finkmann, vol. I: 115–32.
  • Reitz, C. (2019). Rhetorik im Epos – Rhetorik des Epos, in: M. Erler/C. Tornau (eds.). Handbuch Antike Rhetorik. Berlin/Boston: 581–98.
  • Reitz, C./Finkmann, S. (2019). Principles of communication in Greek and Roman epic, in: Reitz/Finkmann, vol. II.2: 471–80.
  • Reitz, C./Finkmann, S (eds., 2019). Structures of epic poetry, 4 vols., Berlin.
  • Richardson, B. (2010). Transtextual characters, in: J. Eder/F. Jannidis,/R. Schneider (eds.). Characters in fictional worlds. Understanding imaginary beings in literature, film, and other media. Berlin: 527–41.
  • Riggsby, A. M. (1992). Homeric speech introductions and the theory of Homeric composition, TAPA 122: 99–114.
  • Rolim de Moura, A. (2008). Speech, voice, and dialogue in Lucan’s Civil War. Diss. Oxford.
  • Romanello, M. (2015) From index locorum to citation network: an approach to the automatic extraction of canonical references and its applications to the study of classical texts. Diss. London.
  • Romanello, M./Finkmann, S./Reitz, C. (2020). EpiBau App. A database of ancient epic. http://epibau.ub.uni-rostock.de/app/.
  • Roochnik, D. (1990). Homeric speech acts. Word and deeds in the epics, CJ 85: 289–99.
  • Sangmeister, U. (1978). Die Ankündigung direkter Rede im ‘nationalen’ Epos der Römer. Meisenheim.
  • Scheirer, W.J./Forstall, C./Coffee, N. (2017). The sense of a connection: automatic tracing of intertextuality by meaning, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31: 204–17.
  • Scodel, R. (2008). Epic facework. Self-presentation and social interaction in Homer. Swansea.
  • Scully, S. (1986). Studies of narrative and speech in the Iliad, Arethusa 19: 135–53.
  • Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge.
  • Searle, J. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts, Language in Society 5: 1–23.
  • Tasler, W. (1972). Die Reden in Lucans Pharsalia. Diss. Erlangen/Bonn.
  • TEI Consortium (eds., 2020). Guidelines for electronic text encoding and interchange. Last updated 2020-08-19. http://www.tei-c.org/P5/.
  • Tsagalis, C. (2004). Epic grief: personal laments in Homer’s Iliad. Berlin/New York.
  • Tucker, R. A. (1969). The speech-action-simile formula in Lucan’s Bellum Civile, CJ 64: 366–70.
  • Verhelst, B. (2017). Direct speech in Nonnus’ Dionysiaca. Leiden. Digital appendix: http://www.dsgep.ugent.be.
  • Verhelst, B. (2018). Narres, si poteris narrare (Ov. Met. 3.192–193). Nonnus’ (Dion. 5.287–551) response to Artemis’ challenge to Actaeon in Ovid, Latomus 77: 773–86.
  • Voigt, A. (2004). Female lament in Greek and Roman epic poetry. Diss. Oxford.
  • Von Contzen, E./Kragl, F. (eds., 2018). Narratologie und mittelalterliches Erzählen. Berlin/Boston.
  • Walter, A. (2014). Erzählen und Gesang im flavischen Epos. Berlin.